Sunday, June 24, 2018

Nonylphenol and The Immortal Dao; Ensouling Sillicone

Environmental and dietary links have been made between hazardous chemicals, human diets, and inter-individual biology that have clinical relation to obesity and diabetes as well as an involved history with NonAlcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and a host of other hepatic function. While many of us have become informed of our favorite foods and restaurants using many harmful chemicals and additives, via social media, much has been done to address the harm that “everyday” chemicals pose towards life and society. Despite the efforts made to remove and alter the impact of everyday chemicals such as Nonylphenol (NP) and Azodicarbonamide (ADA) by both government bodies such as the EPA (EPA, 2016) and by social activist bloggers, some myths and misunderstandings still persist about this basic practice of modern western society. The aim of this essay is to illuminate some of the dangers that plastics and polymers, once posed and currently present to the human biological condition from our most intimate and complex intestinal microbial health, to the health of our waterways and aquatic lifeforms.  
These everyday chemical are interacted with by the average American numerous times a day from pieces of paper that use chemical plastics for pulping to the laminate finishes on our kitchen counters. Having these plastic so involved with our lives it’s important to understand what dangers they might present and under what conditions. Being informed about the latest science behind the use and sanitation of everyday plastics is important to the consumer so being aware of Fake News is also important as good science (Schneider,2017) is needed to deal with potential harm to the environment but also for supporting the productive uses of plastics in society. 
    The industrial level production of so called “everyday chemicals” fall under the jurisdiction of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) who wrote, produced and published an Action Plan in 2010 to address any needed attention to harmful environmental chemicals that could be accidentally escaping into the environment. In;  "Nonylphenol (NP) and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPEs)." the EPA studied the production and lifespan of Nonylphenol (NP) and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPE’s) are examined and incongruencies are noted and categorized. One of the few important discrepancies the EPA was able to note right off the bat, was that some of the products that used NP to produce NPE’s were misidentified in their bureaucratic filings leading to use of NPE’s when alternative should have been used for safety.   
    NP and NPE’s are chemical used in mass production of many household and industrial building and construction projects. NP’s resemble Alkylphenols and are used in the production of soaps and detergents as well as plastic food containers and beauty products and cosmetics. NPE’s that are left to biodegrade often breakdown with a relatively short half life and since they are moderately bioaccumulative, especially in water, they form a significant portion of sewer sludge and sewage waste.  
    The EPA had worked with the top industry leaders in the detergent field to produce laundry detergent that didn’t break down to the environmentally toxic NP and were able to significantly reduce the emission of NP in the soil as well as significantly reduce the amount of bioaccumulation found in fish and shellfish. As of 2010 the EPA was implementing their Action Plan to reduce the use of NP in its everyday chemical uses as the EPA found that despite the short half life of 10-15 minutes when exposed to sunlight, NPE’s that breakdown to the chemical NP tend to accumulate, and are preserved by water. This create a greater risk of NP accumulation in fish and shellfish (EPA, 2010) This accumulation may be one of the reasons that pregnant women are to avoid shellfish, especially as NP has been found in samples of human blood, urine, and breast milk (EPA, 2010). 
    There is little argument that exposure of mammalian tissue to chemicals such as NP and ADA have adverse effects on the microbial life of the GI tract (Snedeker&Hay, 2011) and has been known to contribute to, and is a suspect in, the etiology of some forms of acute asthma and chronic immunodeficiency and has a direct correlation to NAFLD(Yun,Yang,Lun, 2017). It is this effect of the body’s microbiotica that led researchers (Snedeker&Hay, 2011) to investigate the effects of NP on the bodies’ abstract tissue, the Microbial Organ (MO)(Hawrelak&Meyers,2004).  
    Researchers; Snedeker and Hay, found in their analysis of the MO with everyday chemicals such as NP. The researchers found that NP directly influences the chemical metabolism via direct activation of chemicals, alteration of biotransformation of enzymes, changes in enterohepatic circulation, alteration of antioxidants from foods, and alteration of gut motility and barrier function (Snedeker&Hay, 2011). These chemical alteration of the bodies flora and fauna can wreak havoc on the systems of immunocompromised individuals as well as children and the elderly. The researchers were also able to conclude that the exposure of NP lead to obesogenic and diabetogenic conditions. Since obesity and diabetes comorbid with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) many researchers feel that the consumption of everyday plastics should be monitored and or avoided by individuals suffering from MetS.  
    Much of the research into everyday plastics and the MO depends on new research being conducted to better understand the interactions between intestinal gut health and homeostasis in human health and wellness. Dr. Joneja in the article; "'Dysbiosis', Gut Microflora, Probiotics and Their Relevance in Histamine Intolerance", detailed the complex interactions between the microbial organ and the other bodies systems. The microbial organ supports a bacterium population ten times that of the cell count in the human body. This give a wide variability to the type of cultures and to their function. When this function is disrupted a condition known as dysbiosis occurs.   
    Dr, Jonesja explains in the article, how some reportedly “bad” bacteria, is actually the result of an imbalance in the microflora of the microbial organ due to the use of certain medicines and foods like oral antibiotics and some histamine producing foods and drinks. This imbalance might cause toxicity and irritation to the bowl and destroy the function of many healthy microbiota, thus the resulting dysbiosis. Chronic abuse of the microbial organ has been shown to contribute to inflammation and illness in other organs and systems, most notably in the role dysfunctioning intestinal colonial health plays in dysbiosis, Metabolic Syndrome and NAFLD.  
    It is important to understand the current science regarding the use of everyday chemical as they are an important cornerstone in what makes modern society affordable to the everyday consumer(EPA, 2010). America’s surplus of foods and building materials rely on the production of synthetic polymers. This surplus and commonality of goods and products allows for American’s to better afford goods and services that would cost significantly more if they were produced naturally. The safe use of products containing everyday chemicals   




     




Citation 


"Nonylphenol (NP) and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPEs)." EPA. Environmental Protection Agency, 24 Aug. 2016. Web. 31 July 2017.  


Hawrelak JA, Myers SP. The causes of intestinal dysbiosis: a review. Altern Med Rev. 2004 Jun;9(2):180-97. Review. PubMed PMID: 15253677.  
Snedeker, Suzanne M., and Anthony G. Hay. “Do Interactions Between Gut Ecology and Environmental Chemicals Contribute to Obesity and Diabetes?” Environmental Health Perspectives 120.3 (2012): 332–339. PMC. Web. 2 Aug. 2017. 


Jonesja, Janice, Dr. "'Dysbiosis', Gut Microflora, Probiotics and Their Relevance in Histamine Intolerance." Blog post. Histimaine-sensitivity.com. Food Matters, Oct. 2015. Web. <http://onlihttp://www.histamine-sensitivity.com/dysbiosis-gut-microflora-and-histamine-02-16.html#answernelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.20737/epdf>. 


Yu J, Yang X, Luo Y, Yang X, Yang M, Yang J, et al. (2017) Adverse effects of chronic exposure to nonylphenol on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in male rats. PLoS ONE 12(7): e0180218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180218 




Schneider, Leonid. "Fishy Peer Review at Science, by Citizen Scientist Ted Held." For Better Science. Le, 9 July 2017. Web. 1 Aug. 2017.  
Abegunde, Ayokunle T et al. “Environmental Risk Factors for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Evidence Based Literature Review.” World Journal of Gastroenterology 22.27 (2016): 6296–6317. PMC. Web. 2 Aug. 2017. 












     






















No comments:

Post a Comment