Environmental
 and dietary links have been made between hazardous chemicals, human 
diets, and inter-individual biology that have clinical relation to 
obesity and diabetes as well as an involved history with NonAlcoholic
 Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and a host of other hepatic function. While
 many of us have become informed of our favorite foods and restaurants 
using many harmful chemicals and additives, via social media, much has 
been done to address the harm that “everyday” chemicals pose towards 
life and society. Despite the efforts made to remove and alter the 
impact of everyday chemicals such as Nonylphenol (NP) and 
Azodicarbonamide (ADA) by both government bodies such as the EPA (EPA, 
2016) and by social activist bloggers, some myths and misunderstandings still persist
 about this basic practice of modern western society. The aim of this 
essay is to illuminate some of the dangers that plastics and polymers, 
once posed and currently present to the human biological condition from 
our most intimate and complex intestinal microbial health, to the health
 of our waterways and aquatic lifeforms.  
These everyday chemical
 are interacted with by the average American numerous times a day from 
pieces of paper that use chemical plastics for pulping to the laminate 
finishes on our kitchen counters. Having these plastic
 so involved with our lives it’s important to understand what dangers 
they might present and under what conditions. Being informed about the 
latest science behind the use and sanitation of everyday plastics is 
important to the consumer so being aware of Fake News is also important 
as good science (Schneider,2017) is needed to deal with potential harm 
to the environment but also for supporting the productive uses of 
plastics in society. 
    The
 industrial level production of so called “everyday chemicals” fall 
under the jurisdiction of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) who 
wrote, produced and published an Action Plan in 2010 to address any 
needed attention to harmful environmental chemicals that could be 
accidentally escaping into the environment. In;  "Nonylphenol
 (NP) and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPEs)." the EPA studied the 
production and lifespan of Nonylphenol (NP) and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates 
(NPE’s) are examined and incongruencies
 are noted and categorized. One of the few important discrepancies the 
EPA was able to note right off the bat, was that some of the products 
that used NP to produce NPE’s were misidentified in their bureaucratic 
filings leading to use of NPE’s when alternative should have been used 
for safety.   
    NP
 and NPE’s are chemical used in mass production of many household and 
industrial building and construction projects. NP’s resemble 
Alkylphenols and are used in the production of soaps and detergents as 
well as plastic food containers and beauty products and cosmetics. NPE’s
 that are left to biodegrade often breakdown with a relatively short half life and since they are moderately bioaccumulative, especially in water, they form a significant portion of sewer sludge and sewage waste.  
    The
 EPA had worked with the top industry leaders in the detergent field to 
produce laundry detergent that didn’t break down to the environmentally 
toxic NP and were able to significantly reduce the emission of NP in the
 soil as well as significantly reduce the amount of bioaccumulation 
found in fish and shellfish. As of 2010 the EPA was implementing their 
Action Plan to reduce the use of NP in its everyday chemical uses as the
 EPA found that despite the short half life of 10-15 minutes when exposed to sunlight, NPE’s that breakdown to the chemical NP tend to accumulate, and
 are preserved by water. This create a greater risk of NP accumulation 
in fish and shellfish (EPA, 2010) This accumulation may be one of the 
reasons that pregnant women are to avoid shellfish, especially as NP has
 been found in samples of human blood, urine, and breast milk (EPA, 
2010). 
    There
 is little argument that exposure of mammalian tissue to chemicals such 
as NP and ADA have adverse effects on the microbial life of the GI tract
 (Snedeker&Hay,
 2011) and has been known to contribute to, and is a suspect in, the 
etiology of some forms of acute asthma and chronic immunodeficiency and 
has a direct correlation to NAFLD(Yun,Yang,Lun, 2017). It is this effect of the body’s microbiotica that led researchers (Snedeker&Hay,
 2011) to investigate the effects of NP on the bodies’ abstract tissue, 
the Microbial Organ (MO)(Hawrelak&Meyers,2004).  
    Researchers;
 Snedeker and Hay, found in their analysis of the MO with everyday 
chemicals such as NP. The researchers found that NP directly influences 
the chemical metabolism via direct activation of chemicals, alteration 
of biotransformation of enzymes, changes in enterohepatic circulation, 
alteration of antioxidants from foods, and alteration of gut motility 
and barrier function (Snedeker&Hay,
 2011). These chemical alteration of the bodies flora and fauna can 
wreak havoc on the systems of immunocompromised individuals as well as 
children and the elderly. The researchers were also able to conclude 
that the exposure of NP lead to obesogenic and diabetogenic conditions. 
Since obesity and diabetes comorbid with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS)
 many researchers feel that the consumption of everyday plastics should 
be monitored and or avoided by individuals suffering from MetS.  
    Much
 of the research into everyday plastics and the MO depends on new 
research being conducted to better understand the interactions between 
intestinal gut health and homeostasis in human health and wellness. Dr. Joneja
 in the article; "'Dysbiosis', Gut Microflora, Probiotics and Their 
Relevance in Histamine Intolerance", detailed the complex interactions 
between the microbial organ and the other bodies systems. The microbial 
organ supports a bacterium population ten times that of the cell count 
in the human body. This give a wide variability to the type of cultures 
and to their function. When this function is disrupted a condition known
 as dysbiosis occurs.   
    Dr, Jonesja explains in the article, how some reportedly “bad” bacteria, is actually the
 result of an imbalance in the microflora of the microbial organ due to 
the use of certain medicines and foods like oral antibiotics and some 
histamine producing foods and drinks. This imbalance might cause 
toxicity and irritation to the bowl and destroy the function of many 
healthy microbiota, thus the resulting dysbiosis. Chronic abuse of the 
microbial organ has been shown to contribute to inflammation and illness
 in other organs and systems, most notably in the role dysfunctioning intestinal colonial health plays in dysbiosis, Metabolic Syndrome and NAFLD.  
    It
 is important to understand the current science regarding the use of 
everyday chemical as they are an important cornerstone in what makes 
modern society affordable to the everyday consumer(EPA,
 2010). America’s surplus of foods and building materials rely on the 
production of synthetic polymers. This surplus and commonality of goods 
and products allows for American’s to better afford goods and services 
that would cost significantly more if they were produced naturally. The 
safe use of products containing everyday chemicals   
Citation 
"Nonylphenol (NP) and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPEs)." EPA. Environmental Protection Agency, 24 Aug. 2016. Web. 31 July 2017.  
Hawrelak JA, Myers SP. The causes of intestinal dysbiosis: a review. Altern Med Rev. 2004 Jun;9(2):180-97. Review. PubMed PMID: 15253677.  
Snedeker,
 Suzanne M., and Anthony G. Hay. “Do Interactions Between Gut Ecology 
and Environmental Chemicals Contribute to Obesity and Diabetes?” Environmental Health Perspectives 120.3 (2012): 332–339. PMC. Web. 2 Aug. 2017. 
Jonesja, Janice, Dr. "'Dysbiosis', Gut Microflora, Probiotics and Their Relevance in Histamine Intolerance." Blog post. Histimaine-sensitivity.com. Food Matters, Oct. 2015. Web. <http://onlihttp://www.histamine-sensitivity.com/dysbiosis-gut-microflora-and-histamine-02-16.html#answernelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.20737/epdf>. 
Yu
 J, Yang X, Luo Y, Yang X, Yang M, Yang J, et al. (2017) Adverse effects
 of chronic exposure to nonylphenol on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
 in male rats. PLoS ONE 12(7): e0180218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180218 
Schneider, Leonid. "Fishy Peer Review at Science, by Citizen Scientist Ted Held." For Better Science. Le, 9 July 2017. Web. 1 Aug. 2017.  
Abegunde, Ayokunle T et al. “Environmental Risk Factors for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Evidence Based Literature Review.” World Journal of Gastroenterology 22.27 (2016): 6296–6317. PMC. Web. 2 Aug. 2017. 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment